What Is It?
Consider
the following set of 32 binary digits, written in blocks of four
so that the example is not impossible to read.
0010 0110 0100 1100 1101 1001 1011 1111
How
do we interpret this sequence of binary digits?
Answer: The interpretation depends on the use made of
the number.
Where is this 32–bit binary
number found?
Instruction Register If in the IR,
this number will be decoded as an
instruction,
probably with an address part.
Address Register If in the
MAR or another address register, this
is a
memory address.
Data Register If in
a general purpose (data) register, this is data.
Possibly a
32–bit real number
Possibly
a 32–bit integer
Possibly
four 8–bit character codes.
Hexadecimal
Numbers
But
first, we present a number system that greatly facilitates writing long
strings of binary numbers. This is the hexadecimal system.
The
hexadecimal system (base 16 = 24) has 16 digits, the normal ten
decimal digits and the first six letters of the alphabet.
Because
hexadecimal numbers have base 24, each hexadecimal digit represents
four binary bits. Hexadecimal notation
is a good way to write binary numbers.
The
translation table from hexadecimal to binary is as follows.
0 0000 4 0100 8 1000 C 1100
1 0001 5 0101 9 1001 D 1101
2 0010 6 0110 A 1010 E 1110
3 0011 7 0111 B 1011 F 1111
Consider the previous example
0010 0110 0100 1100 1101 1001 1011 1111
As
a hexadecimal number it is 264CD9BF, better written as 0x264C D9BF.
The “0x” is the standard C++ and Java prefix for a hexadecimal constant.
Conversions
between Hexadecimal and Binary
These
conversions are particularly easy, due to the fact that the base of
hexadecimal numbers is a power of two, the base of binary numbers.
Hexadecimal to Binary
Just
write each hexadecimal number as four binary numbers.
String the binary numbers together
in a legible form.
Binary to Hexadecimal
Group
the binary bits by fours.
Add leading zeroes to the leftmost
grouping of binary bits, so that
all groupings have exactly
four binary bits.
Convert each set of four bits to
its hexadecimal equivalent.
Write the hexadecimal number. It is better to use the “0x” prefix.
The
numbering system is often called “Hex”.
Early
proponents of computer security noted many similarities between their subject
and that of disease prevention, called for “safe
hex”.
Three Number
Systems
This
course is built upon three number systems and conversions between them.
Binary Base
2 Digit set = {0, 1}
Decimal Base
10 Digit set = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
8, 9}
Hexadecimal Base
16 Digit set = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
8, 9, A, B, C, D, E, F}
We
shall discuss five of the six possible conversion algorithms.
I
don’t know a good algorithm for direct conversion from decimal to hexadecimal,
so I always use binary as an intermediate point.
Octal
(base 8) notation is useful in certain applications, but we won’t study it.
Other
number systems, such as base 5 and base 7, are useless teaching devices.
Binary,
Decimal, and Hexadecimal Equivalents
Binary Decimal Hexadecimal
0000 0 0
0001 1 1
0010 2 2
0011 3 3
0100 4 4
0101 5 5
0110 6 6
0111 7 7
1000 8 8
1001 9 9
1010 10 A
1011 11 B
1100 12 C
1101 13 D
1110 14 E
1111 15 F
Conversion between
Binary and Hexadecimal
This is easy, just group the
bits. Recall that
A = 1010 B = 1011 C = 1100
D = 1101 E = 1110 F = 1111
Problem:
Convert 10011100 to hexadecimal.
1. Group
by fours 1001 1100
2. Convert
each group of four 0x9C
Problem:
Convert1111010111 to hexadecimal.
1. Group
by fours (moving right to left) 11 1101 0111
Add leading zeroes 0011 1101 0111
2. Convert
each group of four 0x3D7
Problem: Convert 0xBAD1 to binary
1. Convert
each hexadecimal digit: B A D 1
1011 1010 1101 0001
2. Group the binary
bits 1011101011010001
Conversion from Hexadecimal to Decimal
Remember
(or calculate) the needed powers of sixteen, in decimal form.
160 = 1 161
= 16 162 = 256 163 = 4096 164 = 65536, etc.
1. Convert all of the hexadecimal digits to
their decimal form.
This affects only the digits in the
set {A, B, C, D, E, F}
2. Use standard positional conversion.
Example: 0xCAFE
Convert
each digit 12 10
15 14
Positional
conversion 12·163 + 10·162 + 15·161 + 14·160 =
12·4096 + 10·256 +15·16 + 14·1 =
49,152 + 2,560
+ 240 + 14 = 51,966
NOTE: Java class files begin with the following
32–bit (8 hex digit) identifier
CAFE BABE.
This is an inside joke among
the Java development team.
Conversion between Binary and Decimal
Conversion between
hexadecimal and binary is easy because 16 = 24.
In my view, hexadecimal is just convenient “shorthand” for binary.
Thus, four hex digits stand for 16 bits, 8 hex digits for 32 bits, etc.
But 10 is not a power of 2,
so we must use different methods.
Conversion from Binary to Decimal
This is based on standard positional
notation.
Convert each “position” to
its decimal equivalent and add them up.
Conversion from Decimal to Binary
This is done with two
distinct algorithms, one for the digits to the left of
the decimal point (the whole number part) and one for digits to the right.
At this point we ignore
negative numbers.
Powers of
Two
Students should memorize the
first ten powers of two.
20
= 1
21 = 2 2–1 1/2 =
0.5
22 = 4 2–2 1/4 =
0.25
23 = 8 2–3 1/8 =
0.125
24
= 16 2–4 1/16 = 0.0625
25 = 32 2–5 1/32 =
0.03125
26 = 64 2–6 1/64
27 = 128 2–7 1/128
28 = 256 2–8 1/256
29 = 512 2–9 1/512
210 = 1024 2–10 1/1024 » 0.001
10111.011 = 1·24 + 0·23 + 1·22 + 1·21 + 1·20 + 0·2-1 + 1·2-2 + 1·2-3
= 1·16 + 0·8 + 1·4 + 1·2 + 1·1 + 0·0.5 + 1·0.25 + 1·0.125
= 23.375
Conversion of Unsigned Decimal to Binary
Again, we continue to ignore negative numbers.
Problem: Convert 23.375 to binary. We already know the answer.
One
solution.
23.375 = 16
+ 4 + 2 + 1 + 0.25 + 0.125
= 1·24 + 0·23 + 1·22 + 1·21 + 1·20 + 0·2-1 + 1·2-2 + 1·2-3
= 10111.011
This solution is preferred by your instructor, but
most students find it
confusing and opt to use the method to be discussed next.
Side point: Conversion of
the above to hexadecimal involves grouping
the bits by fours as
follows:
Left of decimal: by
fours from the right
Right of decimal: by
fours from the left.
Thus the number is 1 0111.011 = 0001 0111.0110 or
0x17.6
But 0x17.6 = 1·16 + 7·1 + 6/16 = 23 + 3/8 = 23.375
Conversion of the “Whole Number” Part
This is done by repeated division, with the remainders
forming the binary
number. This set of remainders is read “bottom to top”
Quotient Remainder
23/2 = 11 1 Thus decimal 23 = binary 10111
11/2 = 5 1
5/2 = 2 1 Remember to read the binary
2/2 = 1 0 number from bottom to top.
1/2 = 0 1 As expected, the number is 10111
Another example: 16
Quotient Remainder
16/2 = 8 0
8/2 = 4 0
4/2 = 2 0 Remember to read the binary
2/2 = 1 0 number from bottom to top.
1/2 = 0 1 The number is 10000 or 0x10
Convert the Part to the Right of the Decimal
This is done by a simple variant of multiplication.
This is easier to show than to describe.
Convert 0.375
Number Product Binary
0.375 x 2 = 0.75 0
0.75 x 2 = 1.5 1 Read
top to bottom as .011
0.5 x 2 = 1.0 1
Note that the multiplication involves dropping the
leading ones from the product terms, so that our products are 0.75, 1.5, 1.0,
but we would multiply only the numbers 0.375, 0.75, 0.50, and (of course) 0.0.
Another
example: convert 0.71875
Number Product Binary
0.71875 x2 = 1.4375 1
0.4375 x 2 = 0.875 0 Read
top to bottom as .10111
0.875 x 2 = 1.75 1 or
as .1011100000000 …
0.75 x 2 = 1.5 1 with
as many trailing zeroes as you like
0.5 x
2 = 1.0 1
0.0 x
2 = 0.0 0
Convert an “Easy” Example
Consider the decimal number 0.20. What is its binary representation?
Number Product Binary
0.20 · 2 = 0.40 0
0.40 · 2 = 0.80 0
0.80 · 2 = 1.60 1
0.60 · 2 = 1.20 1
0.20 · 2 = 0.40 0
0.40 · 2 = 0.80 0
0.80 · 2 = 1.60 1 but
we have seen this – see four lines above.
So 0.20 decimal has binary representation .00 1100 1100 1100 ….
Terminating
and Non–Terminating Numbers
A fraction has a terminating
representation in base–K notation only if the number can be represented in the
form J / (BK)
Thus the fraction 1/2 has a terminating decimal
representation because it is
5 / (101). It can also be 50
/ (102), etc. Also 1/4 = 25 /
(102), 1/8 = 125/(103).
More on Non–Terminators
What about a decimal representation for 1/3?
If we can generate a terminating decimal
representation, there must be positive integers J and K such that 1 / 3 = J /
(10K). But 10 = 2·5, so this becomes
1 / 3 = J
/ (2K · 5K).
Cross multiplying, and recalling that everything is a
positive integer, we have
3·J = (2K · 5K)
If the equation holds, there must be a “3” on the
right hand side. But there cannot be a
“3” on this side, as it is only 2’s and 5’s.
Now, 0.20 = 1 / 5 has a terminating binary
representation only if it has a representation of the form J / (2K).
This becomes 1 / 5 = J / (2K), or 5·J = 2K.
But no 5’s on the RHS.
Because numbers such as 1.60 have no exact binary
representation, bankers and others who rely on exact arithmetic prefer BCD
arithmetic, in which exact representations are possible.